Company News

read more

A replaceable inner-container design has been introduced, paving the way for a circular economy for sunscreen bottles, lotion bottles, and cream jars.

2026-09-23

Refillable, replaceable‑packaging models are expanding to sunscreen bottles, lotion bottles, and cream jars, shifting away from the disposable, single‑use‑and‑discard paradigm. The outer container can be reused repeatedly over the long term, with consumers simply replacing the inner liner, thereby reducing waste. Sunscreen bottles come with a dedicated squeeze‑type liner, lotion bottles feature pump‑head replacement liners, and cream jars accommodate wide‑mouth liners, covering the mainstream categories of sunscreen, lotion, and face cream. Previously, refillable packaging suffered from issues such as leakage, misaligned snap‑on closures, and compromised seals. Through structural optimization—refining the sealing ring and improving the positioning latch—leakage has been significantly reduced. The outer containers are made from materials that withstand repeated cleaning and resist aging, while the inner liners use lightweight, thin‑walled substrates, helping to keep refill prices affordable and lowering the barrier to entry. Surveys indicate strong acceptance among younger consumers; however, some worry that the wide‑mouth design of cream jars may promote microbial growth with repeated use. In response, the industry has issued standardized guidelines for container cleaning, advanced the standardization of liner specifications, and is working to further popularize circular‑use models for sunscreen, lotion, and cream bottles.

read more

How much does the safety of skincare packaging materials influence consumers’ purchasing decisions?

2026-09-23

A 2026 beauty‑care consumer survey reveals that the safety of skincare packaging materials has become one of the key factors influencing purchasing decisions, second only to formulation ingredients. Survey data show that more than 70% of consumers check for potential migration of harmful substances when selecting skincare products. Among those with sensitive skin, this concern is even more pronounced: nearly 90% actively verify the bottle material and ensure it is free from BPA, plasticizers, and other risky substances. If packaging safety fails to meet standards, consumers are likely to abandon the purchase altogether. Packaging safety goes beyond preventing the leaching of harmful substances; it also affects the stability of skincare formulations during storage. Inferior packaging can react with active ingredients, leading to oxidation, product degradation, and even skin redness or allergic reactions. Many consumers report that seeing brands clearly label their use of inert, safe materials—such as high‑borosilicate glass, food‑grade PP, or compliant PET—significantly boosts their trust. Conversely, brands that have faced public scrutiny over packaging‑related safety issues often see a marked drop in repeat purchase rates. Industry analysts note that growing consumer awareness of packaging safety is compelling brands to strengthen packaging‑migration testing and material‑traceability protocols. Packaging safety has evolved from a previously hidden baseline requirement into a distinctive brand differentiator—particularly in the functional‑skincare and sensitive‑skin segments. Transparently disclosing packaging‑safety test reports can effectively drive consumer purchase intent.